◉ Six Days of Creation, Rest on the Seventh

Everyone knows the Earth was not created in six days, so what does it really mean?

Short URL:
LinkedIn: totrade.co/4sr
Facebook: totrade.co/4sf

Book Audio: totrade.co/ado

Thesis
In Genesis, “six days of creation” and “rest on the seventh” encode a week‑long cataclysm cycle: six days of planetary upheaval followed by a settling phase. Ancient compilers preserved a memory of abrupt Earth resets, later retold as inverse reality, antithetical encoding, of ironic inversion—using familiar language to encode a reversed truth.

1) The “Week” as an Earth Reset
The book explains that global crustal shifts trigger six days of extreme winds, ocean overruns, volcanism, and freezing; on the seventh day the oceans and atmosphere begin to settle. This pattern matches the Genesis cadence and reframes “rest” as geophysical abatement.

◉ Six days: supersonic winds, continent‑scale inundations, molten “earth‑fire,” and rapid freezing; by day six, waters start to run off new topography.

◉ Seventh day: the rampage ends; systems stabilize and a new epoch begins.

2) CIA Sanitization and the Hidden Motif
The text notes the work was sanitized and declassified, indicating official sensitivity to cataclysm narratives. CIA classified it: totrade.co/cia3 —aligns with the book’s own statement about a sanitized release. The core idea: recurrent resets are real, rapid, and repeatedly forgotten.

3) Adam, Eve, the Serpent, and the “Apple”: Technical Meanings
The book reads Genesis through prehistoric Naga/Mayan glyphs, not literal modern terms:

Tree (of life) = a mother continent, parent civilization.

Fruit = peoples descended from that continent.

Serpent (unadorned) = the ocean; serpent around the tree = continent encircled by ocean; Eve’s heel on the serpent = victory over impending inundation by foreknowledge and departure.

Cherubim = foundations/underpinnings; “removed” means the continent lost its base and sank.

Flaming sword = planet‑wide “earth‑fire” from the shallow molten layer breaking through during the event.

Rib/sleep in glyphs = parentage, not anatomy; the tablet shows a deceased female (Lilith) whose child (Eve) with Adam becomes “mother of all living.”

The familiar “apple” is not a fruit in the modern sense; it’s the glyphic “fruit” of the mother continent—membership in the ancestral lineage—and the choice to act on forbidden knowledge (leave before inundation).

4) “Creation” as Re‑Creation (Regeneration)
Genesis I–III is translated as re‑establishment after a cataclysm: light returns; skies clear; land re‑emerges; surviving fauna and humans repopulate. It is a regeneration week following abrupt turmoil, not an original cosmic genesis clock.

5) Why Religions Encode It
Priests and scribes preserved these events as sacred time. The text ties multiple floods and resets (Noah/Utnapishtim, Adam–Eve event) to global stratigraphic and cultural traces, arguing that myths across civilizations are records of cycles, not allegories alone.

6) Message for Today
Ignoring planetary energy laws invites repeat collapse. The “week” warns: six days of chaos will come again; only those who detect the threat and move early reach the “seventh‑day rest.” Our #UGDMN framing—detect, manage, and mediate energy via water enthalpy—fits the book’s emphasis on physical drivers and abrupt resets.

There is a linguistic and symbolic concept: ironic inversion or antithetical encoding. It means expressing a truth by framing it in reverse or through an opposite narrative. This is common in mythic and sacred texts where compilers used familiar cultural forms to hide catastrophic memories.
◉ In Genesis, the “six days of creation” and “rest on the seventh” are to be read as a structured inversion: instead of calm creation, it encodes violent planetary resets followed by a stabilization phase.
◉ Other examples include flood myths where destruction is told as renewal, or “light before darkness” motifs that mask periods of global dimming after impact winters.
◉ Ancient scribes often used contrapuntal symbolism—pairing opposites to preserve meaning for those who knew the code.

This technique served two purposes:
▪ It makes traumatic events acceptable in cultural memory.
▪ It allows transmission across generations without direct fear.